Thank you! Your responses on food waste have been sent to Parliament

Thank you! Your responses on food waste have been sent to Parliament

Thank you to everyone who contributed to questions on food waste! We compiled all your responses and sent a report to the Food Waste in England Inquiry, run by the UK Parliamentary Committee for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs.

You cast a total of 4,583 votes and made 36 comments. Comments came from across the UK with a representation mostly of people between the ages of 15 and 55, as the map and graph for the most voted on question, ‘New building developments should include allotments’ shows.

Geographic location of votes

Location and votes for ‘New building developments should include allotments’

Demographic graph for votes

Demographics for votes on ‘New building developments should include allotments’

The inquiry is looking into the economic, social, and environmental impact of food waste in England. As the inquiry states: ‘In the UK, approximately 8 million tonnes of food is wasted post-manufacture, including households, retail and wholesale and hospitality/food sector. 60% of this could have been avoided. This has an annual value of approximately £16 billion a year.’

What your votes and comments showed

You are very willing to experiment with new ideas. 68% of you think tray-less cafeterias are a great idea or something that you’d be ready to try.

Vote responses

Responses to ‘Would you mind if a cafeteria didn’t supply trays?’

Allotments and community level solutions are popular – with 85% agreeing that new building developments should include allotments and 89% of you (with 11% neutral) agreeing that all households should have access to a food waste digester.

However, it is worth noting that there is a contrast between those who agree that allotments should be part of new developments (89%), versus those who would like an allotment (54%) – possibly we need to ask how many of you have a garden or an allotment already!


Comparing those votes for ‘New building developments should include allotments’ with votes for ‘I’d like an allotment

Most of you agree that ‘Supermarkets should be accountable for the food waste they generate’.

Responses for supermarket accountability

Responses for ‘Should supermarkets be accountable for the food waste they generate?’

There is also a strong positive correlation, between those of you who strongly agree that ‘New housing developments should include allotments’ and those who strongly agree that ‘Supermarkets should be accountable for the food waste they generate’.

On the question of whether food based businesses should pay for food waste removal, Steven Older suggested that ideas could be taken from Switzerland. Commenting: ‘citizens have to pay fees for their refuse service according to the weight of their bins. A similar solution could be implemented here, both, for citizens and, more so, in the food industries’

However, Tom Gibson cautioned not create perverse incentives such as to dump waste illegally if introducing policies for charging for food waste removal, or in requiring supermarkets to donate waste food to homeless shelters and schools – offsetting the food waste problem to another organisation.

You have mixed responses to date labelling. Of the respondents who answered both questions, of those who would like to see standardised date labelling, 45% said they don’t pay attention to use-by dates.

Vince Adams commented on how he paid attention to use-by dates: ‘Up to a point of course but the key is to smell, taste and test your food to decide whether or not its fit to eat, not take some arbitrary date and bin good edible food.’

Comparing responses on date labeling

Comparing the vote responses of ‘Do you pay attention to use by dates?’ with ‘Standardise date labelling on food to reduce food waste’.

Plus, 81% of you stated that you did not worry about re-heating leftover food.

You can explore all the results on the website, and read the 11 page report in full [Google Drive Document], which includes the comments and a breakdown of all the votes.

The committee has yet to set a date for their next meeting, but given it’s coming up to political party conference time, we wouldn’t expect it to happen until at least October.

We will keep you posted on what happens.

Header image by FFCU.

Kathryn Corrick

Digital communications strategist, teacher and open data specialist with an academic background in ethics. Kathryn has been working in and around the web and its impact on civic society for over 15 years, and is particularly interested in how the use of technology and data is changing culture, society, law and democracy.

1 Comment

Post a Comment